|
|
![]() |
|
|
A PROA (Polarized Refrigerant Oil Additive) for all your HVAC & Refrigeration needs. SPECIFICATION SHEET
(*) 582.22 pounds of pressure was the maximum load limit of the equipment. There was no breakdown in lubricity at this point of the Frigi-Tech sample, either before or after removal from the sealed chamber aging test.
In the field of comparison
testing, we have used Suniso 3GS® as a benchmark product. Suniso is the
certified refrigerant oil used as standard by numerous major manufactures of
air conditioning compressors. The viscosity before and
after the addition of 5% Frigi-Tech remain the same at both test points of
100˚F and 212˚F. The viscosity index remains the same as well. The pour point after the
addition of Frigi-Tech does increase from -45˚F to -35˚F. Although this
increase does not affect most applications, including walk-in freezers,
since most refrigeration units do not drop temperature below -20˚F; caution
should be exercised in applications that do fall below -25˚F, and should
only be attempted after conference with a qualified refrigeration engineer. Both the flash point and the
aniline point remain within the same parameters after the addition of
product. The water content is increased by only 15 ppm of oil, and does not
have any significant effect on the chemical stability of the oil. The dielectric strength of
the 95/5% mixture is 26,000 volts, indicating excellent insulating
properties, as needed in hermetically sealed units. The Copper Strip Test
shows no significant difference after the introduction of Frigi-Tech. This
shows that no significant chemical reaction with copper, the common coil
material, is precipitated by the introduction of Frigi-Tech. Perhaps the only and most
significant difference that was noticed after the introduction of the
Frigi-Tech product was a 2,000% improvement in the mixture lubricating
ability. The modified Falex test was used to determine lubricity and the
results are shown on page 1., i.e. Frigi-Tech exceeded the 582 pound limits
of the test. The test is outlined in the Technical Bulletin No. 91006; the
only modification was the use of a machine employing specific weights versus
a torque wrench. This was done to establish a more specific “fail point”. |